I apologize for my suspicions and worry, but I personally find it strange how, within the last few weeks, you have threatened to ban three people, including myself, because we've disagreed with you and offered you our viewpoints and reasoning as to why such things should be allowed and shouldn't be limited. None of whom have had a history of abusing submissions that they have made.
I will not threaten people with ban, even with some disagreement. No-one is every going to completely agree on everything, that's part of what makes us human. However, "broken record" statements or aggressive debating are not something that I or other Factory staff (including FJs) will entertain for long. This statement triggered my warning to you:
I'll repeat again, this is not a mech.
If such issues and problems are happening, then something need to be changed and fixed with the current monthly approval system to stop something like this from happening. Even if this system is very much reactive to reports, which is a good idea, a more thorough look over should be applied to subs to ensure that things like this do not repeat themselves in the future. Auto-approving stuff, while it looks good on paper, can come with needless problems. I'm just going to throw this towards you as some advice for future factory submissions.
It's much different than how the old system worked, that's intentional. The intent was to make it the submitter's job (not the Factory staff's job) to make sure that things are okay. Likewise, the community itself now acts as the primary enforcers of what is and isn't considered acceptable, hence why some of your subs may have escaped commentary or complaints so far. I do not go looking for subs to bring under review (again), other people do and bring them to my attention.