Sith Trooper
New Member
I am new to site, so I did want to get some feed back on what the norms of role-playing on the site are. I do have many years of experience in role-play, and that is why I am...not confused, but looking for clarity if I may without seeming as a know it all noob or some way make this seem like an attack against site or RP done here.
1. I read the rules for RP, really there are none to be honest, just don't be a troll is only thing of merit I got from them which has nothing to do with role-play rules.
2. There seems to be no "stats", a set standard if me noob fights a grand master jedi admin veteran with 9000 posts.
3. There are no dice used to realize outcomes, from reading past posts there is no "thread author" or "admin" that directs the outcomes and it is done by "honor system"
- Respecting another's RP enough to allow your character to take a loss when faced with a unique and good post is always praised in the RP community, but many times people get passionate about their RP and admitting or allowing loss seems to get less and less likely.
4. For PvP you can go by "honor system" and wait for the other player's reply to see what the effect is, but what is the case for NPC conflicts? Is the point of a fight or dominion vs NPC just an automatic win, and you just write up a good story of why you won just as long as you meet the 100-150 posts required?
- From what I have seen, there has been total godmode of NPCs in RPs.
- From Dominion rules, what I gather is "get to 100-150 posts by doing whatever, then at end the judges will decide if good RP or bad RP and give you credit".
I'll use myself as an example, doing my first NPC Dominion with One Sith. I setup the background of getting hired to getting supplies, then stated my "plan" of what I want or aim ICly to accomplish against the NPCs of the Refugee camps. At the moment my Character is camped at a distance, waiting to see the outcome.
Now is my next post going to be...
1. Me saying what happens to the NPCs?
2. Author or Admin reacting on behalf of the NPCs?
3. OOC discussion with author/admin about what should happen and then I write in the outcome from that OOC discussion?
..at the moment, I am thinking from what I have read...honor system, Admins judge at end and give credit if good RP...am I semi-correct or way off? Again not a negative post, or insulting, I am just trying to understand the mindset of the community and admins of how they expect/want RPs to go.
Thank you for your time in reading, even more so if feedback is given
Respectfully Erilus
1. I read the rules for RP, really there are none to be honest, just don't be a troll is only thing of merit I got from them which has nothing to do with role-play rules.
2. There seems to be no "stats", a set standard if me noob fights a grand master jedi admin veteran with 9000 posts.
3. There are no dice used to realize outcomes, from reading past posts there is no "thread author" or "admin" that directs the outcomes and it is done by "honor system"
- Respecting another's RP enough to allow your character to take a loss when faced with a unique and good post is always praised in the RP community, but many times people get passionate about their RP and admitting or allowing loss seems to get less and less likely.
4. For PvP you can go by "honor system" and wait for the other player's reply to see what the effect is, but what is the case for NPC conflicts? Is the point of a fight or dominion vs NPC just an automatic win, and you just write up a good story of why you won just as long as you meet the 100-150 posts required?
- From what I have seen, there has been total godmode of NPCs in RPs.
- From Dominion rules, what I gather is "get to 100-150 posts by doing whatever, then at end the judges will decide if good RP or bad RP and give you credit".
I'll use myself as an example, doing my first NPC Dominion with One Sith. I setup the background of getting hired to getting supplies, then stated my "plan" of what I want or aim ICly to accomplish against the NPCs of the Refugee camps. At the moment my Character is camped at a distance, waiting to see the outcome.
Now is my next post going to be...
1. Me saying what happens to the NPCs?
2. Author or Admin reacting on behalf of the NPCs?
3. OOC discussion with author/admin about what should happen and then I write in the outcome from that OOC discussion?
..at the moment, I am thinking from what I have read...honor system, Admins judge at end and give credit if good RP...am I semi-correct or way off? Again not a negative post, or insulting, I am just trying to understand the mindset of the community and admins of how they expect/want RPs to go.
Thank you for your time in reading, even more so if feedback is given
Respectfully Erilus