Star Wars Roleplay: Chaos

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Star Wars Bender - With Thoughts on Anakin-Padme Marriage

Yoru Shakou

Well-Known Member
I went on a bit of a Star Wars Bender. Starting yesterday I watched Episode IV A New Hope, with it continuing today with Episode V Empire Strikes Back, Episode VI Return of the Jedi, Episode I The Phantom Menace (Yes I know) and Episode II Attack of the Clones (Again, I know.)

Throughout the entire bender, I was beginning to think on the things that somewhat irk me and others that bother me. I'm not including Jar Jar as that is an entirely different can of worms all together. What I ended up focusing on was the Anakin-Padme Marriage. The main frame that brought me to this point of thinking was near the end of Attack of the Clones. At the point where Padme falls from the Gunship and Anakin goes on his emotional whiny bitchy 'We have to go back' rant. With the following line being Obi Wan Kenobi telling him that he would be exiled from the Jedi Order. At that moment I got to thinking that why didn't Kenobi go the opposite way. (Other than George being an idiot and writing it that way.)

Personally I have my own problems with the Anakin-Padme Marriage; then I got to thinking. The Anakin-Padme Marriage wasn't bad, nor was it something to hate; the problem with it is in how it was poorly handled. I look at the scene again where Obi Wan tells Anakin that he would be exiled from the order because of his feelings for Padme; however we've seen so many canon references to previous historical Jedi or characters whom are the offspring of a Jedi and those whom aren't. The most memorable to me being the Handmaiden whose father was an Echani General and Mother a Jedi. The main line though is that the Anakin-Padme marriage was too rushed and handled poorly.

I understand that there were constraints due to the original trilogies' number as Episodes 4, 5 and 6. The entire Marriage while not wrong or bad could have been salvaged and done better had someone taken the time to remove their lips and nose from the backside of Lucas and spoken up. It could have been much better than it was. What we should have seen was Obi Wan coming to his senses (and from what has been developed with the character, realized that he was more or less in the same boat with his own feelings.) To me it was clear that Obi Wan should have looked at Anakin and told him more or less to go be with Padme.

Likewise there could have been and should have been more of a build up to it. We first seen Anakin and Padme in The Phantom Menace (a topic for another day; however I'll say this much. The film isn't that bad when you realize that it just has the big problems and smaller problems. All in all it is a good film with its own merits.) In The Phantom Menace Anakin is 9 and Padme is 14 or so; with roughly a five year gap in age between the two. By the end of the movie Anakin is sporting a padawan braid and is Obi Wan's apprentice now.

Enter now Attack of the Clones when we see that it has been roughly 10 years in passing between The Phantom Menace and now. (Without taking into consideration the stories and novels written about that ten year period between the movies and going on the movies alone.) We have it pushed into our face that Anakin (now 19) hasn't seen Padme (now roughly 24) in that 10 year span because of his Jedi Training and we're expected immediately to believe that the two of them are in love and have feelings for each other the moment that they see one another again. That's the immediate beginning of the problems with how poorly the marriage is handled; mainly because within the 30 to 50 minute mark we see Anakin and Padme get to the point of kissing and Anakin making veiled passes at Padme. Then by the end of the 127 Minute film we have the marriage between Anakin and Padme.

This problem of rapidly pushing the development can also couple with the business decision to slap Episode IV, V and VI onto the original Trilogy to drawn in more crowds and money. Had the films remained as they were (with the original showing being Star Wars A New Hope) and the formula carried over to remain with the other two films, we could have seen much more development within the now prequel Trilogy. There could have been more time to flesh out the Anakin-Padme Marriage; likewise there would be more time for development on other problems that came across in the prequel trilogy films (One of which; that was pointed out to me, as being Anakin's 20 minute fall to the Dark Side.)

It is mainly a personal perspective and view; however overall there is nothing wrong with the Anakin-Padme marriage. It was just done poorly and to the credit of the Actors and Actresses involved they had a difficult script to work with. Again had someone had the testicular fortitude to stand up and tell Lucas that there was a problem. That he was forcing the relationship too quickly to develop along with a myriad of other problems that bog down the prequel trilogy; the films as a whole could have been much, much more well thought out and developed.
 
1 its rushed absolutely, 2 there is an interesting thing to consider that I personally have always had a bit of an issue with.

If you look at the star wars "history" what you find is there are mentions of "family lines"
the "halcyon line" from Kerian Halycon, Corran horn etc. (stackpole in the EU) that family line is supposed to be gifted (stronger) in some abilities, mental tricks, like "affect mind" and absorb/dissipate energy but weak in telekenisis of course if you read "I jedi" his grandfather absorbed ALL the energy out of an opponents lightsaber and then used it to CRUSH the guy with telekenisis.

the issue I have had is if jedi are not supposed to reproduce, (attachment bad) then doesn't that mean that eventually they would "unbreed" themselves out of existence other than "luck" I am not trying to say force ability is a dominant trait (in fact the implications are its either recessive or really "fluky") but that has always bothered me about certain religions and such.
 
It's film. Time is compressed...have you ever experience love at first sight? I was cast as Bianca in Taming of the Shrew, I sat up after a short nap in the theatre to see an extremely handsome man walking across the stage on his hands... he was the actor playing Lucenzio my lover. At that very moment I knew I was going to marry him...A few weeks into rehearsal he moved in, a year later we were married... In EU Qui Gon and Obi Wan both had girlfriends and that is why they permitted Anakin and Padme to experience such a relationship. One of the great things about GL, is he did not stop to explain every little thing in SW. He accepted the fact that you as the observer are smart enough to figure it out. He was revolutionary in his concept. Compare SW to other films of the era which involved so much exposition. In ESB the relationship between Han and Leia is revealed. AOTC is the second act in the trilogy and mirrors ESB.
 
Rage. So much rage.

Definately was rushed, at times felt forced.

Kinda reminded me of the romance between Squall and Riona where it is all "I HATE YOU, I HATE YOU."

Then all of a sudden "HERE ARE THESE RINGS, I LOVE YOU."
 
Another thing---We have an agreement with the artist so we can enjoy his work
Suspension of disbelief or willing suspension of disbelief is a term coined in 1817 by the poet and aesthetic philosopher Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who suggested that if a writer could infuse a "human interest and a semblance of truth" into a fantastic tale, the reader would suspend judgement concerning the implausibility of the narrative. Suspension of disbelief often applies to fictional works of the action, comedy, fantasy, and horror genres. Cognitive estrangement in fiction involves using a person's ignorance or lack of knowledge to promote suspension of disbelief.
 

Boone

1st Recon: "The last thing they'll never see"
When you say ESB's Han and Leia matchup mirrors the AC relationship. No. I'm sorry but this is just entirely false.

Han and Leia had the beginnings of a relationship in a New Hope, with their couples bickering and constant quips. ESB expanded on it further, culminating in a kiss and implied future relationship. RJ is the actual result of years of character development and interaction.

AC was basically just, here's this kid I knew, he's cute, spend a month together on a villa, fall in love even though they portray Padme as if she'd take a lot longer to fall into such a potentially devastating/career ending relationship. They get married within a year.

And on your points for audience filling in...... George is down right horrible at it after OT. The fact that you have to rely on EU to pull a point for the movie proves that. George didn't even write those side stories, probably never read them.

And on him being revolutionary for implication for his era? Na.

Try Hitchcock.
 
Both trilogies have three acts. Act I set-up exposition Act II Climax upping the stakes Act III resolution. If you think GL did such a terrible job he would not have billions in the bank, influence on every media and a legacy that has touched the globe. The U.S. had come out of a Viet Nam, Assassinations of major leaders, Riots, Watergate and GL gave the country "A New Hope" not Psycho or Vertigo or Birds.
 

Boone

1st Recon: "The last thing they'll never see"
I most certainly can when you make nonsense claims encompassing all of cinema. Was Star Wars revolutionary? Yes. In the way you described? No.

He made his money because of a viciously efficient marketing campaign, he wen harkened himself to Vader once. Young George is different from old George..

And Hitchcock ha had an absolutely tremendous influence on horror and suspense in movies.

If you fail to see it , I'm wasting my time .
 
Lucas’ digital experiments that, would transform the movie business.
Industrial Light & Magic (ILM), which he created in 1975 when he couldn't find an outside company to do special effects for "Star Wars." ILM's first breakthrough was a motion-control camera, which could revolve repeatedly around stationary objects while remaining in constant focus, thus simulating flight. To generate cash, Lucas turned ILM into a service company. Having created a market for special-effects-laden films, he began taking on work from other filmmakers. This way he could keep developing techniques while other people funded his research.

Skywalker Sound emerged as the industry's top audio post-production company, then branched out to providing a digital sound system for theaters and homes under the name THX (in honor of his first film). And with the founding of LucasArts Entertainment, Lucas moved into video games, producing such top-sellers as the "Star Wars"-inspired Rebel Assault, X-Wing and Dark Forces.

The animation studio Pixar was founded as the Graphics Group, one third of the Computer Division of Lucasfilm. Pixar's early computer graphics research resulted in ground breaking effects in films such as Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan and Young Sherlock Holmes, and the group was purchased in 1986 by Steve Jobs shortly after he left Apple Computer. Jobs paid U.S. $5 million to Lucas and put U.S. $5 million as capital into the company. Disney announced that it had agreed to buy Pixar for approximately $7.4 billion in an all-stock deal.

Lucas was influential in the development of industry-standard post-production tools such as the Avid Film and Video non-linear editor, first developed as the Edit Droid, and also the Sound Droid, which later became the Digidesign Pro Tools sound editing and mixing software.

But digital movie photography has several advantages: Footage can be reviewed immediately on set after shooting, rather than having to wait for dailies to be printed.
Digital editing is much easier and less expensive since the movie is already in digital form. Movies stored digitally are less susceptible to decay and degradation in quality. Transferring digital movies to DVD is much cheaper since both forms are digital.

Hitchock is known for sexually harassing his leading ladies. Film director Sir Alfred Hitchcock was a sadistic sexual predator who devoted his 40-year career to making stars of ice-cool blondes.

He would become fixated, fall hopelessly in love and, using his powerful position in Hollywood, try to woo them into bed via the casting couch.

And whether he succeeded or failed, Hitchcock would bully them ruthlessly. Among them were Joan Fontaine, Kim Novak, Janet Leigh and — his greatest infatuation of all — Grace Kelly, who later became Princess Grace of Monaco.

But when he plucked Tippi Hedren from obscurity, after spotting her in a TV ad for a diet drink, Hitchcock met his match.
 

Boone

1st Recon: "The last thing they'll never see"
Which says what about story telling abilities and plot development? Which was the whole point of the damn debate?

If I continue with this discussion I'm going to end up saying something offensive out of frustration for your lack of ability to comprehend what was being discussed. If you wish to continue on skype or an unregulated forum, we can.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom