Varus Shatterstar
Finding Purpose
Let us send the Sith to hell where they belong.
If I have offended someone, by all means, I ask that they come to me and say: "You hurt my feelings." or "You offended me with this comment."Lira Dajenn said:Say its all in good fun however much you want, but at a certain point sarcasm and joking goes out the window and turns into plain bitterness. Perhaps if you have already been through this you should knew better than to say things like this at all, especially in a place where tone is actually hard to read.
Airpower is king!Kotkas Adelaar said:Whats the game plan for the invasion?
Note - I edited my post that could have been perceived offensive and made sure people understood I was joking.Kotkas Adelaar said:OK. Alts and having fun aside.
Whats the game plan for the invasion?
I recommended hitting the ASA, because of the dominion the two are doing. And a possible faction merger as well.Slate Estrada said:Can we not fight the OS again? I mean, let's start some beef with another faction.
Explain, please. Last I checked, no faction was forced to write an invasion without their approval.Avalore Eden said:Unfortunately we don't have a choice in the matter as we cannot deny the OS their newly proposed invasion.
Avalore Eden said:Game plan:
OS has already submitted their next Invasion negotiation terms to Republic Admins. Therefore, their invasion comes first.
I understand you guys are eager for blood, and I am totally on board with wanting to take the next fight to them. However, now that their invasion is inbound, there are some new things to consider:
There is a very good chance that if we negotiate terms for both invasions, they will need to happen simultaneously and our memberbase will be split.
There is a very good chance that part of the terms will rule that characters may only take part in one invasion or the other, but not both at the same time.
Please consider the fact the OS active members outnumber us quite significantly. They will have the upper hand in both invasions if allies are not allowed, and will still have the upper hand member-count-wise even if allies are allowed.
So, do we want to carry forward with both invasions and risk this? Or do we want to focus on one invasion (it will have to be their proposed invasion first) with better terms and better chances of winning?
You can toss negotiations on objectives back and forth until someone gets irked enough to get an Admin or RPJ involved and then they decide for you in essence. LoL.Avalore Eden said:You cannot deny a proposed invasion. You can delay the negotiations, but an RPJ or Admin can be brought in to mediate if one suspects the delay is on purpose.
Some people are under the impression that Republic denied an invasion of the Red Ravens. This is false. Their invasion was reported because they did not follow proper term negotiation procedure, and it was not a faction admin that posted what terms there were in the OOC forums. The FL later withdrew the invasion to stem any further drama.
FAs have the same ability to set Invasion terms.Sressechka said:[member="Avalore Eden"]
But we can't set terms if our FL is on LOA, so we can't technically work an invasion.