Star Wars Roleplay: Chaos

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Proposition: "Ship Killers" 'used with permission'

Should we have 'limited' superweapons?

  • Yes. Remove the restriction entirely. But require a Tech Sub for each weapon.

    Votes: 1 4.8%
  • Yes. In a limited form and only with the defending player/faction admin's permission.

    Votes: 5 23.8%
  • No. Too much potential for abuse.

    Votes: 11 52.4%
  • I don't fleet, but the idea scares me.

    Votes: 2 9.5%
  • Noooo! What's stopping someone from targeting my planet?

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Shoot my planet brah. We got a galaxy full of them.

    Votes: 1 4.8%
  • I don't care.

    Votes: 1 4.8%

  • Total voters
    21
Incorrect. It's been in Factory discussion since before my first post in this thread. My guess is that it's been in Factory discussion since Larraq made it.

Please dial back the accusatory language. Staff don't retcon site information to make themselves right.
 

Matreya

Well-Known Member
Dang. Love the whole passive aggressive, "Not a democracy" thing goin on here.

Anyway, I've thought it was a bit odd to have such powerful stuff in the SW universe to begin with. As mentioned, some tech could snipe for hundreds of millions of miles, some could sneak up and explode in ones face to terminate entire bases etc. I agree with the restrictions in place, anyone having control of said weaponry could end up biased. Hell normal ships are miss used on here, no need for something heavier.


And this comes from an 'action advocate'
 

Nyxie

【夢狐】
From the makers of Zombie Nuke, presents Apocannonocalypse! When turbolasers just aren't enough!

Okay, serious note again. Everyone, chillax. It was a discussion between members about content, and like Tef tends to say, that fuels the site. It was a simple discussion. It's over. The poll's pretty obvious. No need to go back and forth, or continue in passive-aggressive shenanigans with staff when they have enough to deal with, or even comment any further. Actually, this should probably be locked or stowed away in the Archives, but that's just my opinion. Larraq asked a question, and he got a pretty settled answer. Agree to disagree and move on. :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom