[member="Jay Scott Clark"]
Terms have largely become reactionary, leaders often creating these terms for the benefit of the faction and not necessarily the members. Which is an important distinction (out to win, not necessarily have fun). On top of that, they have the tendency to run amok. For instance...
The invasions have started requiring activity to be not considered an ally. In a particular invasion, this was transformed into a rule that effectively prevented veterans of the factions from participating because they had been absent recently. Thus not meeting activity needs.
Finally, terms are often constructed for not just the factions particular benefit but also for ease of judgment (pvp only invasion as opposed to including npcs). This also comes with the notion of covering ones bases. So from the perspective of someone who ran invasions for a year, I do think the invasion system is on the fritz. And could definitely benefit from a bit of oversight.
And that's my two cents on this.
Edit: didn't mean to single you out, JSC. But you asked if there was a problem you weren't aware of and I figured I'd give you ma take.