Alena Reckar
Active Member
[member="Drapeam Nyx"]: LOOOOOO...etc, etc, etc...OOOOL.
Except the straightness of characters has already been brought to the front and center. They've kissed, they've hugged, there had been implied sex/fun times, they've talked about being in relationships. What would be different about doing that with someone who just happens to be queer? Nothing. If queer characters shouldn't be shown in any romantic/sexual situations because sexuality isn't important (which in a Star Wars story it isn't, it can just add another layer if there's a love story to go with it, not just a 'hey this one is straight and that one is not') then the straight people shouldn't be able to either. Simple as that.Arumi Zy said:You know I'm going to add more to my opinion. What concerns me is how are they going to reveal it, will there be a big conversation between the character, a sex scene etc. they really don't need to bring any sexuality for front and center. Star Wars isn't about sexuality and it just plain out doesn't need to be added just to be encompassing and politically correct.
And comparing the games to the book is a big difference, optional content vs non-optional.
wowDredge said:[member="Ludolf Vaas"]
Shut up and deal with it
But it's still important?... Because representation, yo. That's always important.Amaethon said:As a member of the LGBT community (they send you a card along with a yearly gay agenda), I couldn't care less. It is like making Dumbledore gay, it adds kark all to the plot.
Yes, but it only serves to make us stand out and be different. As such, we will be the bigger target of ostracism. We are all human beings regardless of our gender (or lack thereof) and whom we feel attraction to. We are the same. We love, we hate, we bleed, we laugh and die. It is ultimately irrelevant if we are lesbian or gay or transgendered. If only more people could see that and understand.Drapeam Nyx said:But it's still important?... Because representation, yo. That's always important.