Star Wars Roleplay: Chaos

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Disney determines New SW Canon

Jsc

Disney's Princess
Exactly. Disney saw the problem of making movies in a Universe where the EU has already covered massive leaps in time. JJ Abrams rebooted Star Trek in an new timeline and I expect he has plans to do some wild changes in the new movies. It's obvious these changes to the up coming movies could not be accomplished and be in harmony with the EU.

Kinda cool really. :D

Moral of the Story: JJ Abrams will do whatever he wants with the new movies and Disney will stamp it Canon. Anything that interferes gets the axe.
 

Aleidis Zrgaat

Young soul from an older generation.
Good. The Star Wars cannon is a heaping, steaming pile of nonsense. Disney might not be able to make it into a legitimate story, but they stand a better chance than Lucasarts ever did.
 

Judas

Lurking SWRP Sites Since 1998
Dirks Hutchinson said:
I'm a EU buff so this doesn't sit well with me.
Same. If it starts to collide with everything I ever learned and memorised, I will drop and go Star Trek full on.
 
If you want new films, and I do, then it’s the price of this. Unless you did a Star Wars movie set 200 years later you’re going to have to clear away the EU otherwise you’d spend so long trying to integrate it that you’d never be able to tell a story.
 
Doesn't bother me too much. I'm not particularly attached to many things in the Expanded Universe. I can't believe some of you are ready to jump ship over this. What, just because some of the EU might be retconned? I highly doubt that they will get rid of any of the real fan-favorite stuff (i.e. things like Shadows of the Empire, Thrawn Trilogy, etc. will probably stay). They will most likely eliminate the extraneous stuff and probably most things taking place after say, 20 ABY, so as not to interfere with the new films. (my estimation based upon when I think the new movies will take place).
 
If they make an entirely different timeline, I can see that and I'd be fine seeing it. I personally think another Star Wars movie is a bad idea, and I love EU personally. Maybe there are some things not adding up, yes, but Disney is out to make money, pure and simple. They will not give it the attention it deserves in my opinion, and will probably scrap most of EU completely.
 
Okay, I know I'm double posting, but this does deserve its own post.

Am I against editing the EU universe? No. I haven't read everything, heck maybe not even some of it with how much there is, but I'll give my peace about the content of what they probably already consider canon.
  • Star Wars IV thru VI: Fantastic, canon as far as the whole of all fans is concerned; no arguments there.
  • Star Wars I thru III: There are details I'm sure everyone wants to change about these movies. Personally, the guy who played Anakin was perfect for his appearance, though his acting and voice left much to be desired. Honestly, they're probably going to stay canon as far as anyone is concerned, so moving on.
  • Clone Wars: I don't know anyone's opinion of the series on here, but I will go ahead and say my peace. It is a cartoon. It was made for children. Star Wars has always, at least in my mind, been a universe that cannot be given a rating like how I'm sure Disney will try to give it. It is for a mature audience in my opinion. There is death; the Dark Side is not something that cannot be turned into a cartoon and get across the full extent of what it is. If they try to give their movies a PG rating, f*ck you Disney. PG-13, it better be a pretty good movie. Yes, Disney has released several movies containing violence, such as the Pirate movies, Lone Ranger, John Carter, etc., and they were all decent to me. But Star Wars can cover, and should cover, the depth of the dark qualities of the universe, and that in and of itself should give it, at the very least, an R rating. I tried watching Clone Wars and to me, it was a money maker. Heck, the purpose of it was to appeal to children and I thought that was the wrong approach. If people want it, I think it should be re-done. Don't make it a cartoon. And if they start on the Mandalorians and don't give them everything they deserve, I'm going to loss faith in them doing anything right at all.
That's my main concern with them making movies and trying to make a more consistent timeline: they won't do it for us. They want money, and that's the only reason George sold the rights. He knew he couldn't do anything else with it, so sold it so that maybe it would go elsewhere. I love creative freedom, but only if it is done with no attachment to whether it will make money. That is where you get the best from, when the people create for the sake of it, and most of the time, what they make is not meant to be put into some system of rating. To get the point across, I'll have to give an example that might not exactly compare to Star Wars but it conveys my point: take the Vampire Hunter D series. Fantastic series, but they made two movies based off the first and third book, and they were butchered, all because they were trying to get it to appeal to the audience viewing them. I feel this is the direction they're going to go. It's how they've acted, and it's how they're going to go based on past behavior.

If they can prove me wrong, I will be happy. I would love to be wrong, and I hope I am, but I'm not confident about it.
 
Honestly, I'm glad for this and I wish it had been done sooner. Attempting to navigate all the details and nuances of EU is frustrating and exhausting.

Plus, maybe this'll bring the perceived power level of the Force down a few notches, which I'd be cream-in-my-pants happy for.
 
I'd like to see Disney clear out a lot of stupid junk, like things that were used once in an obscure, foreign magazine. Shit like that is probably the biggest stain on Star Wars canon for me, personally.
 

Basaba Willamina

A'den and Alor be aliit Willamina
Ayden Cater said:
I'd like to see Disney clear out a lot of stupid junk, like things that were used once in an obscure, foreign magazine. poodoo like that is probably the biggest stain on Star Wars canon for me, personally.
Like the teleporters in the ewok adventures which were a mcguffin of the week? Or the datapad Qui-gon gave Obi Wan detailing two brothers who fell in love with the same woman and destroyed a planet when they fought with the force in star wars shorts? @[member="Ayden Cater"]
 
Circe Savan said:
When stuff currently in use on the site as references to canon are deemed NC, I'll be packing up my bags.
This is something else that I'm concerned about: the timeline continuity of the site. Sure, there are ways to get around this, that, and the other, but if entire sections are deemed non-canon, it's going to screw with a lot of things.

Honestly, I'm worried about how my characters will go if I was going to use something that is now deemed non-canon. Other people's characters, who have been using them for years, may all of a sudden have big gaps because there was an important part now considered non-canon.

It's all very sensitive >.>
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom