Star Wars Roleplay: Chaos

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

I am Jon. Ask me anything.

[member="Lady Psyona"]

I usually don't enjoy writing traditional Jedi. I've done it before, but it hasn't lasted. I've written several Wardens of the Sky and enjoyed it; I've also had quite a bit of fun with Blackguard.
 
[member="Jorus Merrill"]

Always valued your opinion as a writer, a friend and a partner in the best of crimes. Any suggestions to writers who have settled into their "style" and want to improve. I find myself having issues weaving in character descriptors while also getting in the characters head. Any tips?
 
[member="Allyson Locke"]

Verbs. It's gotta be verbs. One thing I see a lot of people doing is being blatant about their descriptors, their adjectives and adverbs. To me, that makes the author's voice too present. Like, if I was to refer to Jorus as 'the Jedi' or 'the smuggler' or 'the dirtbag,' that'd be accurateish and clear, but it wouldn't ring true. Instead, I use verbs and throwaway details that show rather than tell. I could call Jorus something unkind or describe his grungy clothes in detail...or I could just mention offhand that he wipes his hands on a rag or his shirt, picks his nails with a knife, wipes beer off his chin with his sleeve. Verb, detail, verb, detail. You get the idea without me having to tell you. That's what works best for me, anyway. That help?
 
[member="Jorus Merrill"]

I'm probably being a bit of a pest here, but ah, well.

I remember you wrote a witch or two back in the day. Any advice on how to go about it for someone who got roped into it is writing one for the first time?
 
[member="Jorus Merrill"]

The ship wherein Theseus and the youth of Athens returned from Crete had thirty oars, and was preserved by the Athenians down even to the time of Demetrius Phalereus, for they took away the old planks as they decayed, putting in new and stronger timber in their place, in so much that this ship became a standing example among the philosophers, for the logical question of things that grow; one side holding that the ship remained the same, and the other contending that it was not the same.

Which side is correct? Is the fully refurbished vessel still Theseus', or is it a new ship entirely? What if the original planks were gathered up after they were replaced, and used to build a second ship. Which ship, if either, is the true Ship of Theseus?
 
[member="Zark"]

The world has many buildings that have seen continuous use for centuries. St. Paul's Cathedral is still Sir Christopher Wren's masterpiece despite renovations and repairs.

If every original plank of the ship was recovered and the ship was rebuilt, though, it would have pride of place over the continuously renovated ship. Both ships carry the meaning, the symbolism, the design, and the intent - but one is an archaeological artifact, and one is a sociological construct. STEM wins.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom