Raziel
Dark Jedi Spymaster
These ships are for Factions, not individuals.
If a Faction can't muster 3 people for a battlecruiser, they don't deserve one.
If a Faction can't muster 3 people for a battlecruiser, they don't deserve one.
Star Wars Roleplay: Chaos
Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Scrap dev for 1km ships
- Thread starter Jorus Merrill
- Start date
Jairus Starvald
Eidoloclast
[member="Raziel"]
You forget companies making these designs to sell to factions though.
Usually they are run by a single person.
You forget companies making these designs to sell to factions though.
Usually they are run by a single person.
Raziel
Dark Jedi Spymaster
[member="Tai Fa"]
And require a Major Faction on the initial submission to be approved
Amendment: we typically do. It's unlikely that most companies could make a light of battlecruisers without a Major Faction customer.
And require a Major Faction on the initial submission to be approved
Amendment: we typically do. It's unlikely that most companies could make a light of battlecruisers without a Major Faction customer.
Keepin Corellia Weird
You're going to take 'unlikely' and make it a requirement, though, and I don't see that there is any benefit to it being done that way. Granted, ships aren't my forte, but I just don't see any tangible kick to the requirement of multiple writers, other than the dev is apparently boring for some Judges to read if it's all Solo. And that's hardly a basis for a good rule.
Granted, it's nothing to make a stand over either. Ships aren't my main concern. But if we're going to require multiple writers on ship subs, there could easily be an argument for precedent to require major mass-production products to be the same. And that gets really silly. I think the easier and more streamlined option is to just toss it. If it becomes something we need later, it's easy to add back in via sliding scale or as it is proposed now with hard limits.
[member="Raziel"] / [member="Tai Fa"]
Granted, it's nothing to make a stand over either. Ships aren't my main concern. But if we're going to require multiple writers on ship subs, there could easily be an argument for precedent to require major mass-production products to be the same. And that gets really silly. I think the easier and more streamlined option is to just toss it. If it becomes something we need later, it's easy to add back in via sliding scale or as it is proposed now with hard limits.
[member="Raziel"] / [member="Tai Fa"]
