What's New
Star Wars Roleplay: Chaos

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Factory Second Chance Request

Status
Not open for further replies.

John Locke

V U L K A N
John Locke
Admin
Character Bio
Yularen Nova Yularen Nova

This is incorrect, please DO NOT misrepresent the judges during your request for a second chance submission.

The submissions was not denied, it was archived for inactivity since your last post in the thread was on 25 April when you stated you were going to second chance it, however, you failed to post in this thread for almost a month. The submission was thus archived. This was not a case of the judge just "feeling like it" you had actually requested a second chance. Please do not misrepresent the actions of the judges in the future.

In this case, the second chance request is approved.
 

John Locke

V U L K A N
John Locke
Admin
Character Bio
Yularen Nova Yularen Nova

To be precise, the judge told you that "If you disagree with my review you are free to request a second chance in the second chance thread." Which you agreed to. At no time did he use the words denied in regards to your submission. In fact, if you look at the first post in this thread:

John Locke said:
As per the Factory Standardized rules, if your submission has been denied and you feel it has been done so unfairly, you may request a second chance by completing the form below. You may also request a second chance at any point during the active judgement process if you feel you have reasonable evidence of judge bias or believe your submission is receiving an otherwise unfair judgement.
Click to expand...

It's very clear that second chances do not solely apply to submissions that are denied but also can be applied to cases where you feel that the judgement you receive is unfair as was the case this time.

Please make sure to read the judges post and the factory threads clearly and do reach out to me if you're unsure of the language used or if you have any questions.
 
Major Faction

Pom Stych Tivé

Queen of the Nightsisters
Pom Stych Tivé
Character Bio
SECOND CHANCE
John Locke John Locke
Submission Name: Bag of Conjuring
Link to Submission: https://www.starwarsrp.net/threads/bag-of-conjuring.150613/

Reason for Second Chance:
Fun historical facts found here When I was young my parents accused D&D to be of the devil, so I am pretty much D&D illiterate to this day. My search engine pulls a blank for "Dungeons and Dragons, Bag of Conjuring." The idea of how this operates is entirely from my own imagination. I used to send out my Nightsister with a vest loaded up inside with potions, the vest designed like one massive bandolier. I thought on how I could remedy this deadly approach her's.

I am told similar ideas for a Bag of Conjuring is found in D&D, HP, and LotR, which could specifically make the mere idea an item specifically belonging to witches for use, such as the Cauldron. George Lucus did not create his universe entirely from scratch.

Now for the creative B.S. which is why I enjoy the Nightsisters so much, how this item can certainly exist within Star Wars:
The Magickal Spirit of Ichor is said in Canon to 1) create objects, 2) imbue magick into objects, 3) conjure objects out of it, opening up a huge birth for creativity with Nightsister witchcraft. Two suede purses charmed using Force Alchemy while draped with Ichor, become imbued to accomplish a Dimension Shift, making it imbued with the Force to draw an item from bag 2 at point A (storage), into bag 1 at point B (character's possession), and vice versa.

Similar tech brought to my attention, created by other writers, each with their own uniqueness:
Farseer Traveling Bag
Sasori-kojie
Others still use amulets to draw items to their character's grasp.

I believed this to fall into the category of creative force powers. I like the idea of my character carrying a lady's purse with limits to what can be drawn through it, rather than stealing anyone else's idea and using an amulet for conjuring items. A purse in itself is not the creation of D&D, nor conjuring. But if the purse is the actual problem, I could choose to use a vest pocket, or a tulip if necessary.

Thank you for your consideration.
 
Major Faction

Lunafreya Solidor

She of Many Names
Lunafreya Solidor
Character Bio
Submission Name:

AUT/MRK-004 H.R.A.W. "Heavy Maser Repeating Assault Weapon"​


Link to Submission: https://www.starwarsrp.net/threads/...repeating-assault-weapon.154600/#post-2084461
Reason for Second Chance: I made a jest, no one found it funny. Now I must correct my jest, and yes. I apologize for it. Its just 'Intent' is such a 'useless' category on the way I see it, and I have seen a lot of people fill it with gibberish and therefore why I did the same. Won't happen again.
 
Last edited:
Major Faction

Gwyneira Vizsla

Grief & Rage
Gwyneira Vizsla
Character Bio
Submission Name: Gwyneira's Lightsaber Auxiliary.
Link to Submission: Here.
Reason for Second Chance:
I believe this judgement was very unfair. The lightsaber auxiliary and lightsaber rifle are completely different weapons with different effects. The Canon lightsaber auxiliary is essentially a glorified General Grievous or Inquisitor lightsaber spin.

Furthermore, I paid attention to the rules, checked to see if the technology was banned. It was not. I also added very valid and even glaring weaknesses. I followed all the rules and have always been respectful towards staff in past submissions. I put work into making this reasonable, and personally I am very off put by a denial that feels out of nowhere and logically just doesn't make sense to me. I did not create a banned item, yet I was given the treatment of having done so in a premature manner.

QUICK EDIT: If there is an issue felt for overpoweredness, I could easily lessen the blade amounts to 4 like Grievous' spinning lightsaber tech. I'm more than happy to cooperate with staff for edits.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)
Top Bottom