[member="Cira"]
To expand on my reply in the other thread:
The system should be overhauled, so as to allow multiple avenues for a company to tier up. Currently, it's just too rigid.
Additionally, I do disagree with dropping the tier system. When you start bringing in concepts like influence, you're making the system far more complicated than it should be. It really needs to be as simple as it possibly can be.
So, with that said, here's my suggestion. One that could be implemented with relative ease:
The primary unit of measurement for a company's growth should be its products. I say that because the products made by a company are the clearest, and most concise, ways to judge how big it is. Things such as dev threads, or misc threads, won't tell me how big a company is. Whereas, I can safely assume that a company that produces 100 products, is going to be bigger than one that produces 10. (I know in the real world this won't be the case, but I feel it's a safe assumption for Chaos.)
Here's a brief breakdown on how I see a company would tier-up:
Tier 1 > Tier 2: 15 products.
Tier 2 > Tier 3: 20 products + 5 products for a Minor Faction.
Tier 3 > Tier 4: 20 products + 5 products for a Major Faction.
Tier 4 > Tier 5: 25 Products + 10 products for a Major Faction.
Tier 5 > Tier 6: 30 products + 15 products for a Major Faction.
Note: Numbers and such are just examples. They would obviously be balanced later, so it would not be too easy, or too hard, to advance. This is just to show the framework of such a system.
How Misc. Threads would work in this system is that they would be assigned a "value", similar to that of a product. For example, a 10-post misc thread would be equal to, let's say, 2 products. This would be there to allow avenues for companies that specialize in things like mercenary work, or finance, to have a clear avenue to tier up. To make it a bit more fair for everyone.
Now, I'll be the first to admit that I haven't gone to this idea with a fine tooth comb, so there may be holes in it. Giant holes even. However, any changes to the tiering up process needs to address the following:
- Make it fair so that both object-oriented companies, and service-oriented companies, have clear avenues for growth.
- Don't waste peoples time. Writers shouldn't be forced to do Misc. Threads, just because it's a box that they are required to tick. They should do it because it makes sense for their company. For example, a service-oriented company like a Merc. Group, would use Misc. Threads that they have participated in to grow. An object-oriented company, like a Starship Manufacture, would use the products which they have produced to grow.
Ultimately though, that's just my opinion.