My sole problem there is that trusting writers is good, and something all staff should do, but generally speaking, it's better to make sure a loophole is closed before it's exploited than leave it open and hope/pray that nobody does. In my experience, it's always good to hope for the best, but there's always somebody who feels the need to jump in and spoil it. I've seen plenty of forums where the membership is ostensibly trusted, but someone decides to jump in and exploit that loophole, within the rules, and everyone else just gets ticked off. Not because they've done something wrong (after all, the rules allow it!), but because that trust gets broken to the detriment of the board. Me? I like to trust writers to write well and make their stories interesting and FUN. But wherever you get people, you have ego, and ego often dictates that screwing other people for a victory (imagined or otherwise!) is perfectly acceptable. Especially when you don't break any rules to do it.
To my mind, it's good to extend trust, but it's always best never to leave an opening available for somebody to screw you over because you decided to offer them that trust. Something like this, honestly, strikes me as a perfect opportunity - and, I hate to say it, but can you imagine the smaller factions not being tempted to tick off the larger ones and make their mark by using this opening? It'd be good for them, but bad for the atmosphere - last thing you want is anybody feeling ticked off because one group did something to overshadow the other by a technicality.
Just strikes me as a disaster waiting to happen.