Star Wars Roleplay: Chaos

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Are Both Jedi and Sith Evil?

Status
Not open for further replies.
For storytelling purposes the Jedi are the good guys, and the Sith are the bad guys.

At least in the films and in the majority of the media concerning Star Wars.

But in a setting such as ours, there's more leeway for either side to branch into the gray areas of morality.

However; I prefer writing the antagonist; a morally bereft Sith with plans for galactic domination and a penchant for cruelty.
 
How many times has this discussion taken place? It seems never-ending. We could copy paste our responses from the last time. :d




The Astronomer said:
"It was at this moment that the Republic made what might now be considered a mistake: the Sith no longer posed a threat to the Republic, but the Supreme Chancellor was unsatisfied. Jedi and Republic forces were sent to Korriban and other Sith planets to ensure no remnants of the Sith Empire remained."


Sio approves of the Pultimo Solution. * looks at Dark Jedi tag * Oh, right, she's not good.
 
TiCira D'Arr Hawk said:
Everyone always forgets the witches!

Totes just the odd Cajun cousin of this argument.
No one cares about the witches.

3c3ec01b51dd9f8d52f55b4ea3f17927b884dc684b1f3cb7d6428cb4a858c266.jpg
 
Darth Vornskr said:
For storytelling purposes the Jedi are the good guys, and the Sith are the bad guys.

At least in the films and in the majority of the media concerning Star Wars.

But in a setting such as ours, there's more leeway for either side to branch into the gray areas of morality.

However; I prefer writing the antagonist; a morally bereft Sith with plans for galactic domination and a penchant for cruelty.

I agree. Like earlier it was stated that or story telling purposes (lets say the original trilogy) there is only good, jedi ... and bad, sith.

But part of the reason I originally wrote sith was the journey. I'm a bad guy so I am going to be a sith, is boring to me. Too black and white. I like Stackpole's 'I, Jedi' where Corran saw that the line between good and evil is blurred. There is a grey. But the book also goes on to show that their is a definite point where you become bad. But why become bad? The Jenasarri were 'dark' because of their origins, how their tribe had interactions with the jedi that affected how they developed. Even though they were doing good in their eyes thy were still dark. It's toeing the line. But doing the wrong things for the right reasons, like how Anakin 'tried' to be portrayed in the prequel series. The slide to mass murder could be slow filled with small choices that eventually become huge ones.

So are Sith evil, in my opinion yes. But they may not have started off that way (and I'm talking about the individual). The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Or the ends justify the means.

Now Jedi. I have written jedi, but I prefer sith. As fr them being good, yes that is there purpose. But the jedi have done evil. It was mentiond arlier that the republic were responsible for the annihilation of the sith homeworlds, and the jedi assisted. But the republic were the primary antagonists. So the jedi were the minor antagonists? What about when the republic and the jedi took out mandalore because they didn't fall into the place that the power that be wanted? What about the republic and the jedi using a slave army made of clones and used them like droids, expendable. The jedi are supposed to value life, and yet they willingly used the created army of humans where were ten years old and led them into war. Were the clones paid? No. Sick leave? No. They were used and the jedi went along with it.

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

The jedi may not have begun these atrocities, but they allowed them to play out. There is a such a thing as lying by omission. Well the jedi were permissive in their permission of these acts by not standing up.

For the jedi, sometimes the ends did justify the means. And to an order that believed rght is right, and to protect life ... that is the greatest betrayl.


That was my scatter brain two cents lol.

Movies = Jedi = Good ... Sith = Bad

In the world of RP ... characters are individuals who make choices that shape their destiny's
 
Nemesis Nemonus said:
I agree. Like earlier it was stated that or story telling purposes (lets say the original trilogy) there is only good, jedi ... and bad, sith.

But part of the reason I originally wrote sith was the journey. I'm a bad guy so I am going to be a sith, is boring to me. Too black and white. I like Stackpole's 'I, Jedi' where Corran saw that the line between good and evil is blurred. There is a grey. But the book also goes on to show that their is a definite point where you become bad. But why become bad? The Jenasarri were 'dark' because of their origins, how their tribe had interactions with the jedi that affected how they developed. Even though they were doing good in their eyes thy were still dark. It's toeing the line. But doing the wrong things for the right reasons, like how Anakin 'tried' to be portrayed in the prequel series. The slide to mass murder could be slow filled with small choices that eventually become huge ones.

So are Sith evil, in my opinion yes. But they may not have started off that way (and I'm talking about the individual). The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Or the ends justify the means.

Now Jedi. I have written jedi, but I prefer sith. As fr them being good, yes that is there purpose. But the jedi have done evil. It was mentiond arlier that the republic were responsible for the annihilation of the sith homeworlds, and the jedi assisted. But the republic were the primary antagonists. So the jedi were the minor antagonists? What about when the republic and the jedi took out mandalore because they didn't fall into the place that the power that be wanted? What about the republic and the jedi using a slave army made of clones and used them like droids, expendable. The jedi are supposed to value life, and yet they willingly used the created army of humans where were ten years old and led them into war. Were the clones paid? No. Sick leave? No. They were used and the jedi went along with it.

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

The jedi may not have begun these atrocities, but they allowed them to play out. There is a such a thing as lying by omission. Well the jedi were permissive in their permission of these acts by not standing up.

For the jedi, sometimes the ends did justify the means. And to an order that believed rght is right, and to protect life ... that is the greatest betrayl.


That was my scatter brain two cents lol.

Movies = Jedi = Good ... Sith = Bad

In the world of RP ... characters are individuals who make choices that shape their destiny's
In the real world, it is on an individual scale, and on a "bigger picture" it is Jedi whom are good and Sith whom are bad. Only because of their goals, and how they go about getting there, and why.

In Star Wars logic/lore/etc, it is a bit more gray on the Jedi part, although the Sith are entirely dark. There is no if's and/or but's in this situation. The Jedi are bound to a code that is essentially an ethic, not morality. Morality is based on emotion and good vs evil. The Jedi code is "This is what we do, this is the Jedi way, do it any other way, even if it is "good", it is not the way we do it, thus is not right."

Sometimes things they do are bad in our subjective opinions, but they do everything to follow the law in a neutral and objective manner. In essence, they are Lawful Neutral in the most extreme and yet loose ways possible.

The sith, however, are more complex in their lawful/neutral/chaotic aspect, but are strictly Evil, though some individuals may lean toward neutral. There is no scheme to strengthen the galaxy with power and do it the "right" way and the "natural way". That is literally what has been canonically stated by Lucas and authors as a way for them to sweet talk you into joining them. It is also a trope, which I can find a link to if I am asked for it.

Edit: The Jedi Order did not participate in the war against Mandalore. It was a group led by Revan and Malak, whom were all expelled from the order for their refusal to listen to the Order, whom did so.

Also, the Jedi protested the use of Clones, which I believe was touched on in the beginning of episode 2. The Jedi do not get to make decisions about the republic, as

Mace Windu: We're keepers of the peace, not soldiers.
 
Keeper of the peace not soldiers became commanders and generals. So officers.
Using the clones was wrong, and they didn't stand up to them.

And the above mentioned war wasn't the one with Revan ... It was this one ...

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Mandalorian_Excisionhttp://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Mandalorian_Excision

From the first paragraph ...

Alarmed by the rising threat of the Mandalorians, the Jedi Order organized the Republic's Judicial Forces and Planetary Security Forces in a preemptive strike on Mandalorian Space.

Course this comes from an irredeemable mando'ad lol

[member="Silara Vantai"]
 
Atin Kandossii said:
Keeper of the peace not soldiers became commanders and generals. So officers.
Using the clones was wrong, and they didn't stand up to them.

And the above mentioned war wasn't the one with Revan ... It was this one ...

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Mandalorian_Excisionhttp://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Mandalorian_Excision

From the first paragraph ...

Alarmed by the rising threat of the Mandalorians, the Jedi Order organized the Republic's Judicial Forces and Planetary Security Forces in a preemptive strike on Mandalorian Space.

Course this comes from an irredeemable mando'ad lol

[member="Silara Vantai"]
Yes, and it was also because the Mandalorians were (in previous installments in canon) preparing to re-enact their "glory days" of contesting the Republic, the very same Republic that was currently in a very bad place as far as stability is concerned. The Ruusan reformations is a necessary read to look at this, as the Jedi whom took part in this are specific individuals manipulated by the Senate / working with the Senate to further the Republic's goals, not so much the Jedi Order themselves making such attempts. While I agree this was an atrocity in hind-sight, at that time they had just finished being completely curb-stomped by the Mandalorians and the Sith directly afterwards. If this had been any other period of time later, such as during 300 BBY and onward, it would have been much more understandable to use this as an accusation of Jedi corruption.

But it is also a very important thing to note that every single Galactic Senate since Darth Zannah disappeared after killing Bane has been controlled by the Sith or manipulated in some way to work towards the "Grand Scheme" that Palpatine and Plagious were going to enact together as the time was finally approaching. (Palpatine killed his master and went on to continue this with Vader/Annakin).
 

1000

Guest
1
In all out honesty...Jedi made the Sith what they are today. By exiling the Dark Jedi, and trying to kill them all for practicing something they didnt believe in....the Jedi are evil. Think about it. Had the Dark Jedi been left to do their crazy works with the Dark Side which isnt evil in itself, what you do with it determines your own prefrence. BUt because the the Jedi see it as a unknown..its evil, so anything in the dark side is evil. Thats how I see it, and Im using the canons just before the Four Hundred Years of Darkness. That was revenge nothing more. The Jedi brought it upon themselves.
 
I can put it a new way: is morality subjective or objective in the Star wars Universe? How does it apply to each side? What about Sith moral nihilism? Sure the evil man believes that they are doing good. But what defines evil? Furthermore, can something be judged as evil if it is unintentional?
 

Malik Rodarch

Guest
M
People are all inherently terrible and selfish.

I could probably count all the truly good Jedi on SWRP on one hand, but evil? Eh, some are (particularly those who use Dark Side powers like it's going out of fashion, giving way to a new alignment called Stupid Evil) but those are numbers that can be counted on the other hand. Most Jedi fall under well-meaning yet conflicted, they are human (or alien) but evil they are not.

Sith, Sith, there are evil Sith and there are also well-meaning yet conflicted Sith. I mean, yo, Anakin's motives at the beginning. Not every Sith is ambition central, tyranny and terror, look at my fabulous cloak, but yes, generally more evil there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom