nihil
Yeah, disagreement is a part of open discourse. So do it politely. Please.
Basically we aren't going to borrow directly from the canon and we're gonna do our own thing because no one likes to be confined to a tiny little pocket-version of something someone else wrote.Ludolf Vaas said:has stated that the Wills are supposed to function like Moffs. We need to figure out which era of Moffs they will function like, because in Star Wars lore they have played different roles depending on the time period - Sith Empire, Galactic Empire, and Krayt's Empire.
First part: Yeah, I see. That was sort of something that I felt could be developed by the story. Sort of the concept that the strength of the group is dictated by the activity of them with the inevitable notion that at any point, the War council can just smack them down. Push a tree till it bends, not break, sort of thing. Wills, in my perspective, are limited in role over their planet only by the imagination. For instance, I saw a king of a planet and the despot of another being capable of holding this position. However, a Charter developed by the legislative body could have mandate to define that with the Faction Admins, as members of the War council, holding veto for what lies in the best interest of the faction. I.e. we want creativity and new opportunity but not necessarily to stray so far from what we are as to be something entirely different.Ludolf Vaas said:On the power and function of "Wills"
@Shacrath has stated that the Wills are supposed to function like Moffs. We need to figure out which era of Moffs they will function like, because in Star Wars lore they have played different roles depending on the time period - Sith Empire, Galactic Empire, and Krayt's Empire.
Problems with the "Sith Empire" approach and possible solutions
The biggest problem I see with modeling the Wills after Sith Empire Moffs was that the Moffs of that era were completely subordinate to the Dark Council over them. This would lead to problems if the intention is to have high-ranking NFUs on equal footing with high-ranking Sith. However, if people don't mind NFUs taking on a subordinate role, this could work.
Additionally, it was never made completely clear what exactly the Moffs duties were in the SWTOR era. But if we were to have a similar system, a solution might be to have them in charge of regional governments and military forces (as already stated), while still taking orders from the highest ranking Sith in our faction (whoever they are). The War Council would function similarly to the Dark Council, making all the major decisions of the Empire. The Wills would then basically be in charge of implementation. Then I suppose it would be assumed that the Moffs have various generals and admirals underneath them, thus making Will the highest attainable and most prestigious NFU position.
So essentially, the heirarchy would look something like this:
Emperor ----> War Council (comprised of only Sith) -----> Wills (comprised of only NFUs) ------> Admirals and Generals -------> Everybody else
Additionally, Wills would function differently than the Voice position, because Wills are directly in charge in only areas that the Sith Empire actually controls. It seems to me that the position of Voice is much grander and more theoretical in scope, because it divides the entire galaxy among five Sith, regardless of whether those territories actually belong to us or not. Perhaps the implementation of Wills would get rid of the need for Voices? Something to be discussed.
There is also the Galactic Empire and Krayt Empire approach, but I'm too tired to dive into that now. More on that later.
Eske said:Can we get these two ideas in a closet for 5 minutes of fame and produce a functional offpsring?
Everything we do is based in canon to some degree. To disregard canon completely is pretty silly, since a) this faction, like every other major faction, is already based on it and b) canon can provide helpful resources and direction for ideas.Shachath said:Basically we aren't going to borrow directly from the canon and we're gonna do our own thing because no one likes to be confined to a tiny little pocket-version of something someone else wrote.
Thing is, this proposal was going to be rather complicated no matter what. We already have a bit of a complicated (and in my opinion, confusing) heirarchy here and we now have to figure out how to incorporate this system into that as seamlessly as possible. Which is what I'm trying to do right now.Shachath said:Well... that was easy, basically Ludolf, no one else wanted something over-complicated because they wanted to build something on their own. Which is completely understandable because it is a game where people world-build and get creative and do new things. If you dont want that, you can get in on the ground floor and work to change it through writing stories.
So if I'm understanding correctly, you propose we give the Wills a veto function over the War Council?Reverance said:irst part: Yeah, I see. That was sort of something that I felt could be developed by the story. Sort of the concept that the strength of the group is dictated by the activity of them with the inevitable notion that at any point, the War council can just smack them down. Push a tree till it bends, not break, sort of thing. Wills, in my perspective, are limited in role over their planet only by the imagination. For instance, I saw a king of a planet and the despot of another being capable of holding this position. However, a Charter developed by the legislative body could have mandate to define that with the Faction Admins, as members of the War council, holding veto for what lies in the best interest of the faction. I.e. we want creativity and new opportunity but not necessarily to stray so far from what we are as to be something entirely different.
Reverance said:I don't think it removes the need for Voices - I see it as part of the same scheme except one is a member of congress and the other is a member of the senate (just a metaphor, this isn't to say that the legislation would perform like that). Ultimately one has more power but that doesn't mean that neither serve a purpose.
From my understanding of how the different discussions tie in together this idea is being heavily tied this very discussion. It seems some of the War Council seats will be held by NFU Generals and Admirals.Isamu Baelor said:NFU should have a position that they can strive towards that is equivalent to what FU can get to.
There really shouldn't be a lower ceiling just because you chose your character to not be force-sensitive.
This honestly doesn't bother me at all. In every version of the Empire we've seen, the absolute top positions have always been occupied by Sith. Ultimately the Sith are going to want to be the ones who rule their own system, that just makes sense. That's not to say there isn't room for very powerful NFUs.Isamu Baelor said:There really shouldn't be a lower ceiling just because you chose your character to not be force-sensitive.
Instead of this, if we're going to be putting an NFU or two on the War Council, why not make a position that is unique to them?Eske said:It was stated in the previous discussion thread that the Admins have agreed to open up the position of Voice to NFUs.
To clarify this for ALL who are concerned about NFUs and the Voice position.Eske said:It was stated in the previous discussion thread that the Admins have agreed to open up the position of Voice to NFUs.